about the book of a warning anonymouse
about the book of a warning anonymouse
A Warning is a book-length exposé of the Trump administration, anonymously authored by someone described as a "senior Trump administration official". It is a followup to an anonymous op-ed published by the New York Times in September 2018. The article, "I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration", described President Donald Trump's decision-making as uninformed and irresponsible, and said that many current members of the administration deliberately undermine his suggestions and orders for the good of the country.[1]
The book, which expands on the op-ed, is set to be released on November 19, 2019, by Twelve, an imprint of the Hachette Book Group. The author received no advance payment and will donate some royalties to nonprofits. The author is represented by Javelin, a firm that has represented authors of other major Trump exposés (A Higher Loyalty, Team of Vipers).[2]
A couple of weeks before the official release of the 259-page book, several media outlets obtained pre-release book excerpts. The Washington Post reported discussions of potential mass resignation, a “midnight self-massacre”, to warn the public of the gravity of the chaotic situation inside the White House.[3][4] The Rachel Maddow Show covered concerns over the president's eroding decision-making capabilities, "a toxic combination of amorality and indifference", and discussions of removal of the president using the 25th Amendment.[5][6][7] Other media have been covering the excerpt on the president's mental acuity and volatility, that he "stumbles, slurs, gets confused, is easily irritated, and has trouble synthesizing information".[8][9][10]
The White House responded to the book excerpts, calling the book a "work of fiction” and the author a "coward". Vice President Mike Pence insisted he never heard any talk about using the 25th Amendment to remove Trump from office.[11] The Justice Department wrote a letter to the author warning that he or she may be violating one or more nondisclosure agreements by writing the book.[4] The publisher defended the author, denied the need for a pre-publication review, challenged the government's apparent attempt to out the author's identity (as with other inner-circle whistleblowers), and said the DOJ was just trying to intimidate them.[12][13][14][15]
The Associated Press theorized that public curiosity over the author's identity may resemble the public riddle that occurred after the release of Primary Colors, a roman à clef on the Bill Clinton 1992 presidential campaign.[2]
تعليقات
إرسال تعليق